PDA

View Full Version : 10/11/06 DOS Worldwide Caution


mtp51
10-11-2006, 04:15 PM
Worldwide Caution Public Announcement

October 11, 2006


This Public Announcement updates information on the continuing threat of terrorist actions and violence against Americans and interests overseas. This supersedes the Worldwide Caution dated June 6, 2006 and expires on April 9, 2007.

The Department of State remains concerned about the continued threat of terrorist attacks, demonstrations and other violent actions against U.S. citizens and interests overseas. Current information suggests that al-Qa'ida and affiliated organizations continue to plan terrorist attacks against U.S. interests in multiple regions, including Europe, Asia, Africa and the Middle East. These attacks may employ a wide variety of tactics to include assassinations, kidnappings, hijackings and bombings.

Ongoing events in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East have resulted in demonstrations and associated violence in several countries. Americans are reminded that demonstrations and rioting can occur with little or no warning.

In August 2006, British authorities arrested a significant number of extremists engaged in a plot to destroy multiple passenger aircraft flying from the United Kingdom to the United States. The September 2006 attack on the U.S. Embassy in Syria and the March 2006 bombing near the U.S. Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, illustrate the continuing desire of extremists to strike American targets.

Extremists may elect to use conventional or non-conventional weapons, and target both official and private interests. A series of bombings in Thailand in May and September 2006 which targeted tourist destinations, the bombings in the Egyptian resort town of Dahab in April 2006, the bombings at a market in Palu, Indonesia in December 2005, the hotel bombings in Jordan in early November 2005 and the bombing of a crowded marketplace in New Delhi in October 2005 illustrate how terrorists exploit vulnerabilities associated with soft targets. Additional examples of such targets include high-profile sporting events, residential areas, business offices, clubs, restaurants, places of worship, schools, public areas and locales where Americans gather in large numbers, including during holidays. Financial or economic targets of value may also be considered as possible venues; the failed attack on the Abqaiq oil processing facility in Saudi Arabia in late February 2006 is one such example.

In the wake of the August 2006 plot against aircraft in London, numerous terrorist attacks on trains in India in 2006, the July 2005 London Underground bombings, and the March 2004 train attacks in Madrid, Americans are reminded of the potential for terrorists to attack public transportation systems. In addition, extremists may also select aviation and maritime services as possible targets.

U.S. citizens are strongly encouraged to maintain a high level of vigilance, be aware of local events, and take the appropriate steps to bolster their personal security. For additional information, please refer to "A Safe Trip Abroad" found at http://travel.state.gov.

U.S. Government facilities worldwide remain at a heightened state of alert. These facilities may temporarily close or periodically suspend public services to assess their security posture. In those instances, U.S. embassies and consulates will make every effort to provide emergency services to U.S. citizens. Americans abroad are urged to monitor the local news and maintain contact with the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate.

As the Department continues to develop information on any potential security threats to U.S. citizens overseas, it shares credible threat information through its Consular Information Program documents, available on the Internet at http://travel.state.gov. In addition to information on the Internet, travelers may obtain up-to-date information on security conditions by calling 1-888-407-4747 toll-free in the U.S. or outside the U.S. and Canada on a regular toll line at 1-202-501-4444.

Kairho
10-11-2006, 06:58 PM
"so you had better vote republican..."

deangreenhoe
10-11-2006, 08:15 PM
"so you had better vote republican..."
[/b]

:lol: :lol: :lol: Touche! Yes, IGNORE that page scandal because you are in DANGER...from something or other. Yes, still in danger. It's the same danger, but still dangerous. Best to stay home and hide.

Just thought you ought to know. :rolleyes:

weblet
10-12-2006, 08:05 AM
Nope, can't agree with you guys. If they didn't publish the warning and something happened, everyone would be ranting and raving about "Why didn't the government say something!!"

At least you can choose to ignore it if you want.

deangreenhoe
10-12-2006, 08:25 AM
Nope, can't agree with you guys. [/b]

Well, dang you, Weblet. :lol:

It was my impression that they were re-releasing data that was already in place on their website. When I read it, all I could hear in my head was Chevy Chase proclaiming, "Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead ... " :P

jfrenaye
10-12-2006, 09:42 AM
Since this topic seems to be more politically charged, I am moving it from the terror section to the politics....

John

CruiseExpert
10-12-2006, 10:34 AM
Good move.

Kairho
10-12-2006, 10:35 AM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(weblet @ Oct 12 2006, 08:05 AM) 39453</div>
Nope, can't agree with you guys. If they didn't publish the warning and something happened, everyone would be ranting and raving about "Why didn't the government say something!!"
[/b]Warnings about specific problems is one thing but such generalities form the start of a slippery slope.

People become much too dependent on someone else and fail to take responsibilities on themselves. The extrapolation is the government becoming responsible for telling us everything, at the risk of lawsuit if they miss anything. I, for one, don't need the government to become responsible for everything.

By the way, don't run inside the house and don't rub your eyes.

jfrenaye
10-12-2006, 10:49 AM
I see the need to renew the warning (which is really what this is). We were caught with our pants down in 2001 and heaven forbid it happens again. (I think it will, but I hope not).

So, the need for reaffirmation is definately there, but one also needs to question the timing. 3 Weeks before an election. And the GOP is not the only guilty party here either. The DEMS have done it as well.

To be honest, I think this whole Foley-gate (hey did I just invent that word? I am not sure I have seen it anywhere...hmmmmm maybe I can finally cash in and retire) has some DEM overtones. Not denying he is a scum and did it, but I think that the disclosure of his acts was an orchestrated effort. Think about it.....some house DEM gets wind of this in February---hell the spin machine will whitewash this in a few months time and it is a wasted scandal. But, if it comes out between the promaries and the election, in a year when the DEMS are desparate to reclaim one or both houses, hmmm, maybe it makes sense to hold on a bit before we leak it. I am not saying....I am just saying....

deangreenhoe
10-12-2006, 11:17 AM
To be honest, I think this whole Foley-gate (hey did I just invent that word? I am not sure I have seen it anywhere...hmmmmm maybe I can finally cash in and retire) has some DEM overtones. Not denying he is a scum and did it, but I think that the disclosure of his acts was an orchestrated effort.[/b]

That wouldn't surprise me in the least. I'm not one of those people who feel being a member of either party automatically makes you a more honest or trustworthy person. I'm afraid both sides are equally capable of playing dirty. I do have my political leanings (like anyone else) but it's one of the reasons I'm a registered independent and I don't play "The Party Game." (It's a bit like "pin the tail on the donkey" but you never get to take your blindfold off and everyone gets pricked. :lol: )

Well, this is the first time I've heard Foley-gate, John, but you probably won't be able to cash in on my ignorance of current event news slang.

weblet
10-14-2006, 09:09 AM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Kairho @ Oct 12 2006, 10:35 AM) 39484</div>
Warnings about specific problems is one thing but such generalities form the start of a slippery slope.

People become much too dependent on someone else and fail to take responsibilities on themselves. The extrapolation is the government becoming responsible for telling us everything, at the risk of lawsuit if they miss anything. I, for one, don't need the government to become responsible for everything.

By the way, don't run inside the house and don't rub your eyes.
[/b]

As it is, I happen to agree with the fact that People become much too dependent on someone else and fail to take responsibilities on themselves.

greenearth
10-28-2006, 10:56 AM
[quote]
La Cage aux Foley

deangreenhoe
10-28-2006, 11:02 AM
La Cage aux Foley[/b]

Ooh. Groaner alert. :lol: